|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
|
Chapter 2
|
|
A PLENITUDE OF PORTRAITS
1839-1890
|
Camera Portraits in Asia
|
The introduction of portrait photography in the Far East coincided with
changes from insular traditionalism to the acceptance of modern ideas in
science, symbolized by the 1854 American diplomatic ultimatum that Japan
be opened to the West; indeed, the ideographs used to denote photograph in
Japanese (shashin) literally mean "copy truth." The first portrait
daguerreotypes made in that country appear to be those by Eliphalet Brown,
Jr., American artist and photographer attached to Commodore Matthew
Perry's expedition to Japan, but experimentation with the daguerreotype
process had been going on since 1848 when a Nagasaki merchant imported the
first camera.
|

|
However, successful daguerreotypes by Japanese photographers were not
made until 1857, only a year before the first collodion portraits
by a Japanese photographer. As shown in a woodblock print of 1861, French
Couple with a Camera (pi. no. 72), photographers working in Japan during
the early period were foreigners who not only provided views and portraits
but taught the process to the Japanese. Apparently by the mid- to
late-'70s they were so successful that professional studios were opened in
all the major cities of Japan, with more than 100 in the Tokyo area alone;
even the unapproachable royal family permitted members to sit for camera
likenesses.
Although China remained isolated from Western ideas of progress longer
than Japan, photographers from the West began to make portraits there,
too, during the 1860s. Among the succession of foreigners, Milton Miller,
a Californian who ran a studio in Hong Kong in the early 1860s, made
formally posed yet sensitive portraits of Cantonese merchants, Mandarins,
and their families, while the Scottish photographer John Thomson
photographed workers and peasants as well, including their portraits in
his ambitious four-volume work Illustrations of China and Its People,
published in England in 1873/74. It is thought that native Chinese
photographers were introduced to photography when they were employed
during the 1850s as copyists and colorists in the Hong Kong studios run by
foreigners, but while some 20 native studios with Chinese names are known,
little else has been discovered about these portraists. The studio of
Afong Lai appears to have been the most stable of the native-owned
commercial enterprises, lasting from 1859 on into the 20th century and
with the artistry of its work acclaimed by Thomson.
On the Indian subcontinent, however, photography in all its varieties,
including portraiture, was promoted by the British occupying forces and
eagerly taken up by Indian businessmen and members of the ruling families.
Commercial firms owned by Indian photographers, individuals appointed by
the courts, and those working in bazaars began to appear in large cities
after the 1860s in order to supply the British and Indian ruling class
with images of themselves. The most renowned enterprise was that started
by Lala Deen Dayal, owner of studios in Indore, Bombay, and Hyderabad from
the 1880s on, who became court photographer to the nizam of Hyderabad.
Many portraits made in India during this period were painted over in the
traditional decorative style of Indian miniatures, just as in the West
painted camera portraits were treated naturalistically. This attitude
toward the photographic portrait in India has led to the suggestion that
the camera itself was used in a different fashion than in the West, that
Indian photographers were somehow able to avoid the representation of
space and dimensionality even before die paint was added. However,
allowing for obvious differences in pose, dress, and studio decor, Indian
photographic portraits that were not painted over do not seem remarkably
different from the general run of commercial portraiture elsewhere.
|
72. YOSHIKAZU ISSAN.
French Couple with a Camera Color woodblock print.
Agfa-Gevaert Foto-Historama, Cologne, Germany.
|
|
|
The Portrait as Personal Expression
|
Alongside the likenesses produced by commercial studios, a more
intimate style of portraiture developed in the work of amateurs-—men and
women in mostly comfort-able circumstances who regarded photography as an
agreeable pastime but did not make their living from it. During the 1860s
and '70s this group—which included Olympe Count Aguado and Paul Gaillard
on the Continent and Julia Margaret Cameron, Lewis Carroll, Cosmo Innes,
and Clementina, Lady Hawarden, in Britain-—used the collodion process to
portray family and associates, at times in elaborately casual poses, in
actual domestic interiors and real gardens. When Carroll photographed his
artistic and intellectual friends and their children, he favored the
discreet and harmonious arrangements seen in his grouping of the Liddell
sisters—Edith, Lorina, and Alice (pi. no. 73). At the same time, his
stress on the virginal beauty of these young sitters (also evident in his
nude photos, pl. no. 334) reflects an ambivalence that embraced ideals of
feminine innocence and his own deep-seated sexual needs.
Cameron, the most widely known Victorian portraitist (usually
considered an amateur even though she sold and exhibited her work), also
used the camera to idealize her subjects. Seeking out men and women whose
individuality or impressive artistic and literary contributions appeared
to her to redeem the materialism of the time, she importuned them to pose
so that she might record, in her words, "faithfully, the greatness of the
inner as well as the features of the outer man." Avoiding sharp focus, she
concentrated on the evocative handling of light, seen at its most
effective in portraits of Sir John Herschel—a family friend of many years
(pi. no. 74)—and of her niece Julia Jackson, who had just wed Herbert
Duckworth and was to be the mother of novelist Virginia Woolf (pi. no.
75).
Cameron's work, like that of Carroll, can be related to the
Pre-Raphaelite search for ideal types, but her portrait style especially
seems to have been inspired by the paintings of her artistic mentor,
George Frederic Watts, which in turn reflected die taste among the British
intelligentsia for Rembrandt-like chiaroscuro effects in the treatment of
form. Critical reaction from Cameron's contemporaries was divided;
while art critics for the general press and a number of photographers in
England and abroad approved of her approach, the medium's most vocal
propo-nents of art photography criticized the "slovenly manipulation" and
regarded her work as "altogether repulsive."
Newly emerging scientific ideas provided still other uses for the
photographic portrait during the collodion era. Aside from the
documentation of strictly medical problems (skin lesions, hydrocephalism,
etc.), the camera was called upon to document psychological reactions and
mental aberrations. Dr. Hugh Welch Diamond, who be-came interested in the
calotypc shortly after the announcement of Talbot's discovery, was one of
the first to advocate such scientific documentation. After he was
introduced to collodion by Archer—a former patient—he used the new
technology to photograph female inmates in the Surrey Count}' Asylum (pi.
nos. 76-77), where he was superintendent. In a paper read to the Royal
Society in 1856, Dr. Diamond outlined the relationship of photography to
psychiatry, suggesting that portraits were useful in diagnosis, as
treatment, and for administrative identification of the patients. In The
Physiognomy of Insanity, illustrated with engravings based on Dr.
Diamond's likenesses, physiognomic theories that had related photography
to the depiction of normal character were extended to embrace the mentally
abnormal.
Fleeting facial expressions were photographed in 1853 by Adrien
Tournachon (brother of Felix) for a work on human physiognomy by the noted
Dr. Guillaume Benjamin Duchenne de Boulogne, the founder of
electrotherapy, and in 1872 Charles Darwin chose to use photographs to
illustrate The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, for which he
approached Rcjlander. In addition to images supplied by Duchenne, and by
two lesser-known figures, the book included a series showing emotional
states, and for five of them Rejlander himself posed as model (pi. nos.
78-79). Despite the theatricality of a number of the expressions depicted
in these portraits, the use of the camera image in this capacity relegated
to a minor role the traditional graphic conventions for portraying the
human passions.
In the 30 years following the discovery of photography, the camera
portrait occupied center stage. Images on metal, glass, and paper provided
likenesses for large numbers of people—the newly affluent as well as many
who formerly could not have imagined commissioning a painted portrait.
Many of these images can be regarded today as no more than "archeological
relics," but in their time they served to make generations of sitters more
aware of their position in society and of themselves as individuals, even
when they glossed over physiological and psychological
frailties. In addition, photographs taken at various stages of
life—youth, middle age, and elderly—made people more conscious of
mortality and their relationship to ephemeral time. The cult of
individualism also was promoted by the practice of publishing and selling
likenesses of famous persons. With the image as a surrogate, more people
were made to feel closer to political and cultural figures, even while the
likenesses themselves emphasized distinctiveness. On the whole, the
general run of commercial camera portraiture is quickly exhausted in terms
of insight or aesthetic interest, yet in the hands of creative individuals
(both amateur and professional), among them Southworth and Hawes, Hill and
Adamson, Cameron, Carroll, and Nadar, portraits seemed to distill an
artistic ideal while still probing individual personality. The importance
of studio portraiture was diminished by the invention of new cameras and
technologies that permitted people to make likenesses of family and
friends at home, but the portrait itself—as a mirror of personality, as an
artistic artifact, and as an item of cultural communication—has remained
an intriguing challenge to photographers.
|

|
73. LEWIS CARROLL (REV. CHARLES L. DODGSON). Edith, Lorina, and Alice
Liddell, c. 1859.
Albumen print. Photography Collection, Humanities Research Center,
University of Texas, Austin.
|
Lewis
Carroll
(see collection)
Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (27 January 1832 – 14 January 1898),
better known by the pen name Lewis Carroll, was an English author,
mathematician, logician, Anglican clergyman and photographer.
His most famous writings are Alice's
Adventures in Wonderland and its sequel Through the Looking-Glass as well
as the poems "The Hunting of the Snark" and "Jabberwocky", all considered
to be within the genre of literary nonsense.
His facility at word play, logic, and
fantasy has delighted audiences ranging from children to the literary
elite, and beyond this his work has become embedded deeply in modern
culture, directly influencing many artists.
|

LEWIS CARROLL.
Edith, Lorina and Alice Liddell
|
|
|

LEWIS CARROLL.
Alice Liddell, 1959
|
|

LEWIS CARROLL.
Alice Liddell
|
|

LEWIS CARROLL.
Alice Liddell, 1858
|
|

LEWIS CARROLL.
Alice Liddell, 1870
|
|
|

|
74. JULIA MARGARET CAMERON. Sir John Herschel, April, 1867.
Albumen
print. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; Gift of Mrs. J. D. Cameron Bradley.
|

|
75 JULIA MARGARET CAMERON. My Niece Julia Jackson, 1867.
Albumen print.
National Portrait Gallery, London.
|
Julia Margaret Cameron
(see collection)
|

|

|
76. DR. HUGH WELCH DIAMOND.
Inmates of Surrey County Asylum, 1852. Albumen prints. Royal
Photographic Society, Bath, England.
|
77. DR. HUGH WELCH DIAMOND.
Inmates of Surrey County Asylum, 1852. Albumen prints.
Royal Photographic Society, Bath, England.
|
|
Dr Hugh Welch Diamond
(1809 – June 21, 1886)
was one of the earliest photographers, and made a major contribution to
the progress of the craft.
A doctor by profession, he opened private practice in Soho, London, and
then decided to specialise in the treatment of mental patients, being
appointed to Bethelhem Hospital, the Surrey County Asylum. Diamond was one
of the founders of the Photographic Society, was later its Secretary and
also became the editor of the Photographic Journal.
He used photography to treat mental disorders; some of his many calotypes
depicting the expressions of people suffering from mental disorders are
particularly moving. These were used not only for record purposes, but
also, he claimed in the treatment of patients, although there is little
evidence of success.
Perhaps it is for his attempts to popularize photography and to lessen its
mystique that Diamond is best remembered. He wrote many articles and was a
popular lecturer, and he also sought to encourage younger photographers.
Among the latter was Henry Peach Robinson, who was later to refer to
Diamond as a "father figure" of photography.
Recognition for his encouragement and for his willingness to share his
knowledge came in 1855, in the form of a testimonial amounting to £300 for
services to photography; among those who subscribed were such people as
Delamotte, Fenton and George Shadbolt. In 1867, the Photographic Society
awarded its Medal in recognition of "his long and successful labours as
one of the principal pioneers of the photographic art and of his
continuing endeavours for its advancement." The following year, at his own
initiative, he relinquished any further salary as Secretary of the
Society, and became its Hon. Secretary.
|

|
DR. HUGH WELCH DIAMOND. Seated Woman, 1855; Woman with hair standing on
end, 1850-1859; Roger Fenton, 1856
|
|

|

|
78. OSCAR GUSTAV REJLANDER, GUILLAUME BENJAMIN DUCHENNE DE
BOULOGNE. Illustrations for The Expression of the Emotions in Man
and Animals, by Charles Darwin, 1872. Heliotypes. Photography
Collection, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox, and Tilden
Foundations.
|
79. OSCAR GUSTAV REJLANDER, GUILLAUME BENJAMIN DUCHENNE DE
BOULOGNE.
Illustrations for The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals,
by Charles Darwin, 1872. Heliotypes. Photography Collection, The New
York Public Library,
Astor, Lenox, and Tilden Foundations.
|
|
|
see also:
Duchenne de Boulogne. Contractions musculaires, 1856
collection:
Guillaume Benjamin Amand Duchenne
|
|
Profile:
David Octavius Hill and
Robert Adamson
(see collection)
|
At his death in 1870, David Octavius Hill was mourned for being a
deeply religious but blithe spirit who had devoted his life to improving
the arts in Scotland. An unexceptional though competent painter of the
Scottish countryside (pi. no. 80), Hill played an important role in the
cultural life of Edinburgh. He was born into a family of booksellers and
publishers in Perth and learned lithography early in his career,
publishing, in 1821, the first lithographic views of Scotland in Sketches
of Scenery in Perthshire. In association with other artists who were
dissatisfied with the leadership of the Royal Institution, Hill
established the Scottish Academy in 1829, and remained connected with it
in unpaid and, later, official capacity until his death. By the 1830s,
Hill's interest turned to narrative illustration; among his works were
lithographs for The Glasgow and Garnkirk Railway Prospectus, The Waverly
Novels, and The Works of Robert Burns.
Involvement in the Scottish Disruption Movement, which led to the
establishment of the Free Church of Scotland and independence from the
Church of England, inspired in Hill a wish to commemorate this event in a
painting of the clergymen who took part in the dispute. Introduced by Sir
David Brewster to Robert Adamson (pi. no. 81), through whom he became
aware of Talbot's process, Hill planned to use photography as an aid in
painting the likenesses of the 400 members of the Disruption Movement. In
1843 he entered into a partnership with Adamson, about whom relatively
little is known, to produce calotypes in a studio at Rock House, Calton
Hill, Edinburgh, and
sometimes on location. In their joint work, each man provided an
element missing in the other. Before 1843, Adamson's work was wanting in
composition and lighting, while, on the evidence of work done with another
collaborator some 14 years after Adamson's premature death, Hill lacked
sensitivity and skill in handling the camera. During the partnership, Hill
energetically organized the sittings for his proposed painting, but as
the two partners became more deeply involved with the medium, they
calotvped subjects, persons, and landscape views that had no relation to
the Disruption painting, producing between 1843 and 1848 about 2,500
separate calotypes. Unfortunately, Hill discovered that many of the
negatives tended to fade, a circumstance that along with Adamson's death
seemed to make further involvement in photography unattractive.
After 1848, Hill continued to use photographs as studies for his
paintings and to sell individual calotypes from his brother's print shop,
while devoting time to the affairs of the Scottish Academy and other local
art associations. Following a second marriage in 1862 and the unsuccessful
attempt to photograph in collodion with another partner, Hill returned to
the Disruption painting, completing it in 1866. Compared with the vitality
and expressiveness of the calotype studies, the painted figures are
unconvincing and seem to exist without air or space; the picture, however,
was greeted with kindness, and Hill's last photographic project involved
an endeavor to make photographic facsimiles of this work. Had he not
become involved with photography, it is unlikely that Hill would have
merited more than a footnote in the history of the arts of the 19th
centurv.
|

|
80. DAVID OCTAVIUS HILL. On the Quay at Leith, 1826.
Oil on wood.
Scottish National Portrait GaUery, Edinburgh.
|

|
81. DAVID OCTAVIUS HILL. Robert Adamson, c. 1843.
Calotype. Gemsheim
Collection, Humanities Research Center, University of Texas, Austin.
|
Profile:
Julia Margaret Cameron
(see collection)
|
One of seven daughters of a prosperous British family stationed in
India, Julia Margaret Pattle was regarded by friends as generous,
impulsive, enthusiastic, and imperious—"a unique figure, baffling beyond
description." Educated in England and France after the death of her
parents, she returned to India and in 1838 married Charles Hay Cameron, an
eminent jurist and classical scholar, who invested his fortune in coffee
plantations in Ceylon. In the ten years prior to their return to England,
Mrs. Cameron assumed the social leadership of the Anglo-Indian colony,
raised money for victims of the Irish Famine, and translated the
well-known German ballad Lenore, but her boundless energy craved even
greater challenges.
After settling in Freshwater, on the Isle of Wight, Cameron, using a
camera given her by her daughter in 1863, embarked on a career in
photography, concentrating on portraits and allegorical subjects. Models,
at times paid but mainly importuned, were drawn from among her family; the
household staff at the Cameron residence, Dimbola; and the households and
visitors to the homes of Alfred, Lord Tennyson, and Sara Prinsep,
Cameron's sister. These were many of the most famous figures in British
artistic and literary circles, including Thomas Carlyle, Darwin, Herschel,
Marie Spartali, Ellen Terry, and Watts, but the photographer also was
interested in portraying the unrenowned as long as she found them
beautiful or fall of character. Besides hundreds of idealized portraits,
she created allegorical and religious subjects, particularly of angels
(pi. no. 82) and the Madonna, which emphasized motherhood. Because of her
disappointment with the poor quality of the woodcut transcriptions of
Tennyson's Idylls of the King, Cameron raised money to issue two editions
that were photographically illustrated.
Cameron's attitude toward photography was that of a typical upper-class
"amateur" of the time. She refused to consider herself a professional,
although the high cost of practicing the medium led her to accept payment
for portraits on occasion and to market photographic prints through P. and
D. Colnaghi, London printsellers. They often bore the iegend: "From Life.
Copyright Registered Photograph. Julia Margaret Cameron," to which she
sometimes added that they were unretouched and not enlarged. Her work was
shown at annual exhibitions of the Photographic Society of London and in
Edinburgh, Dublin, London, Paris, and Berlin; at the latter it was
acclaimed by Hermann Wilhelm Vogel and awarded a gold medal in 1866. In
1875, the Camerons returned to Ceylon, where for the three years before
her death she continued to photograph, using native workers on the
plantations and foreign visitors as models.
|

|
82. JULIA MARGARET CAMERON. The Rising of the New Tear, 1872.
Albumen
print. Private Collection.
|
|
Profile:
Nadar
(see collection)
|
In many ways Nadar (Gaspard Felix Tournachon) (pi. no.84) typifies the
best qualities of the bohemian circle of writers and artists that settled
in Paris during the Second Empire. Born into a family of printer
tradespeople of radical leanings, young Nadar became interested in many of
the era's most daring ideas in politics, literature, and science. After an
ordinary middle-class education and a brief stab at medical school, he
turned to journalism, first wring theater reviews and then literary
pieces. Although a career in literature seemed assured, he gave up writing
in 1848 to enlist in a movement to free Poland from foreign oppressors, an
adventure that ended suddenly when he WAS captured and returned to Paris.
There followed a period of involvement with graphic journalism, during
which he created cartoons and caricatures of well-known political and
cultural figures for the satirical press. This culminated in the Pantheon
Nadar (pi. no. 83), a lithographic depiction of some 300 members of the
French intelligentsia. Only mildly successful financially, it mack Nadar
an immediate celebrity; more important, it introduced him to photography,
from which he had drawn some of the portraits.
In 1853, Nadar set up his brother Adrien as a photographer and took
lessons himself, apparently with the intention of joining him in the
enterprise. However, despite the evident sensitivity of Adnen's portrait
of the sculptor Ernile Blavier (pi. no. 85), his lack of discipline is
believed to have caused Nadar to open a studio on his own, moving
eventually to the Boulevard des Capucines (pi. no. 86), the center of the
entertainment district. He continued his bohemian life, filling the studio
with curiosities and objets d'art and entertaining personalities in the
arts and literature, but despite this flamboyant personal style he
remained a serious artist, intent on creating images that were both
life-enhancing and discerning.
Ever open to new ideas and discoveries, Nadar was the first in France
to make photographs underground with artificial light and the first to
photograph Paris from the basket of an ascendant balloon. Even though a
proponent of heavier-than-air traveling devices, he financed the
construction of Le Geant, a balloon that met with an un-fortunate accident
on its second trip. Nonetheless, he was instrumental in setting up the
balloon postal service that made it possible for the French government to
communicate with those in Paris during the German blockade in the
Franco-Prussian War of 1870.
Ruined financially by this brief but devastating conflict, Nadar
continued to write and photograph, running an establishment with his son
Paul that turned out slick commercial work. Always a rebel, at one point
he lent the recently vacated photo studio to a group of painters who
wished to bypass the Salon in order to exhibit their work, thus making
possible the first group exhibition of the Impressionists in April, 1874.
Although he was to operate still another studio in Marseilles during the
1880s and '90s, Nadar's last photographic idea of significance was a
series of exposures made by his son in 1886 as he interviewed chemist
Eugene Chevreul on his 100th birthday, thus fore-shadowing the direction
that picture journalism was to take. During his last years he continued to
think of himself as "a daredevil, always on the lookout for currents to
swim against." At his death, just before the age of ninety, he had
outlived all those he had satirized in the famous Pantheon, which had
started him in photography.
|

|
83. NADAR (GASPARD FELIX TOURKACHON). Pantheon Nadar, 1854.
Lithograph. Bibliotheque Nationalc, Paris.
|

|
84. NADAR (GASPARD FELIX TOURNACHON). Self-Portrait, c. 1855.
Salt
print. J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles.
|

|
85. ADRIEN TOURNACHON. Emile Blavier, c. 1853.
Albumen print. Bibliotheque Nationalc, Paris.
|

|
86. UNKNOWN PHOTOGRAPHER (French). Facade of Nadar's Studio at 35
Boulevard des Capucines,
Paris, after 1880. Albumen print. Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris.
|
The Galerie Contemporaine-Appearance and Character in 19th-century
Portraiture
|
The Galerie Contemporaine, a series of 241 portraits of celebrated
artistic, literary, and political figures in France during the Second
Empire and Third French Republic, was issued in Paris between the years
1876 and 1894. A different portrait, accompanied by biographical text,
appeared each week from 1876 to 1880; after that the album became an
annual devoted almost exclusively to those in the mainstream pictorial
arts. The images were the work of some 28 photographers who operated
studios in Paris during this period; they were published in different
sizes, depending on the dimensions of the original negative or plate, and
usually were presented within a decorative border. Because in some cases
they were taken long before they were used in the Galerie, the individual
portraits are difficult to date. Whether these photographs were produced
by carbon process or Woodburytype has not been definitively established,
but the fact that the publisher, Goupil et Cie., had purchased a franchise
for the Woodburytype process in France some years earlier suggests that
the images were made by this method.
In this selection, portraits by noted photographers Etienne Carjat (pi.
no. 87) and
Nadar exemplify the pictorial excellence possible through adroit
manipulation of pose, demeanor, and lighting, while the image by Tourtin
(pi. no. 88)
indicates that the work of little-known portraitists included in this
ambitious publication also achieved a high level of excellence.
|
|
Etienne Carjat
(see collection)
|

|
87. TTITNNT CARJAT. Alexandre Dumas, from Galerie Contemporaine, 1878.
Woodburytype. Museum of Photography at George Eastman House, Rochester,
N.Y.
|

|
88. TOURTIN. Sarah Bernhardt, from Galerie Contemporaine, 1877.
Woodburytype. International Museum of Photography at George Eastman House,
Rochester, N.Y.
|

|
|